Caverton
Helicopters yesterday faulted the House of Representatives' Committees on
Justice and Aviation report that an 'agency relationship' exists between it and
the controversial Rivers State owned aircraft N565RS.
The
aviation company denied the existence of such a relationship and demanded
concrete evidence from those who claim otherwise.
In
its reaction on Sunday, Caverton Helicopters said it was surprising how the
committees arrived at such weighty position and recommendation 'without an
independent, forensic investigation and without any counter-veiling evidence
other than the mere say-so of a party to a dispute.'
'We
expected more rigour, more nuance, more balance, and greater restraint from
such an august body,' added the statement signed by communication consultant to
Caverton Helicopters, Mr. Waziri Adio.
'We
challenge those who insist on manufacturing an 'agency relationship' where none
exists to show concrete evidence,' the statement said. 'Such concrete evidence
should include mandate from Rivers State Government to Caverton Helicopters on
the said aircraft; evidence of payment(s) to Caverton Helicopters with
corresponding invoice(s) for the purported services provided by us to the State
Government in the last eight months on this aircraft; executed management or
agency contract between the State Government and Caverton Helicopters; and any
correspondences (whether through letter or email) on the issue during the past
eight-month period we were purportedly involved with the aircraft.'
The
company maintained that the only relationship it had on the aircraft was an
'unconsummated' one. 'We were instructed by ACASS, a Canadian firm, to help
apply for importation permit for the aircraft in August 2012,' the company
said. 'We sent a letter to the Minister of Aviation on August 27, 2012. But the
same ACASS told us to stop because it was no longer in charge of the aircraft.
So that relationship was not consummated. And that was the last dealing we had
on the aircraft.
'After
the grounding of the aircraft in April 2013, we surprisingly found out that our
name had been used severally to apply for flight clearance permits for the same
aircraft to allow it to fly within the country due to its foreign registration
status. Those requests were forged, and we have said so to the regulatory
authorities. The attempt to say that because we were involved with a request
for aircraft importation in August 2012 means we were also necessarily involved
with requests for flight clearances in 2013, despite our denial, tasks
elementary logic to breaking point. Since it is inconceivable that we, as a
private company, would have provided the purported services without payment and
without documentation, we are challenging Rivers State Government to provide
concrete evidence of contracts between us and payments/invoices by them to us'.
Caverton
Helicopters also went ahead to state that the issue of who was responsible for
the aircraft was settled categorically in February this year. 'The pilot of the
aircraft, Captain Tosin Odulaja sent an email to an over-flight agency,
Eurocontrol on February 5, 2013 that all the bills and charges for the aircraft
should be passed on him,' the statement claimed. 'With that mail, the pilot
himself admitted that Caverton Helicopters was not the operator of the aircraft
and disclaimed any so-called agency relationship. This admission was made a
clear two months before the controversy about the aircraft broke out. If the
pilot accepted we were not responsible for the aircraft two months earlier, how
come the pilot and his employers are now saying we are responsible for same
aircraft? If two months earlier they disclaimed our responsibility on the
aircraft, on what basis are they now saying, and the committees are also
insinuating, that pressure was put on us to deny them? To deny them about what
they themselves previously admitted did not exist?'
Caverton
Helicopters added that as a business it would never deny any of its clients.
'We have nothing to gain from denying our clients,' the company stated. 'But we
cannot be bullied, intimidated and blackmailed into admitting a fictitious
relationship. We urge the public to look beyond partisanship and call on
security agencies to independently investigate the matter.'
It
could be recalled that in their report laid before the House last Thursday, the
committees not only submitted that there was an agency relationship between
Rivers State and the company, they went on to call for the prosecution of
Caverton Helicopters 'for providing information that led the authorities to
wrongly believe that Rivers State Government falsified documents leading to
grounding of its aircraft.'
Source: Thenigerianvoice
No comments:
Post a Comment
WE APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENT. THIS IS KAF COMMUNITY